Adidas
Analysis summary
moralscore.orgQui n'a jamais porté des baskets Adidas ? La réputation de la marque aux 3 bandes n'est plus à faire. Pourtant, l'entreprise a été étrillée pour sa politique envers les ouvriers (conditions de travail médiocres, salaires insuffisants dans les ateliers asiatiques), la présence de produits toxiques dans certains articles, et son score zéro sur l'équité des relations avec les partenaires. La dimension fiscale est curieusement l'une des meilleures du secteur (score 3/5).
Risk level
Several dimensions are poor. Risk of fines, scandal or boycott is elevated. Caution advised.
Detailed risk analysis
Long red bar = high risk on this dimension. Short green bar = solid dimension.
Environmental impact: CO₂ emissions, waste management, water use, climate commitments.
Tax and societal contribution: paying taxes where revenues are generated, philanthropy, local commitments.
Governance: executive pay, board independence, financial transparency, shareholding structure.
Responsible innovation: R&D, beneficial new uses, positive disruption in its market.
Working conditions: fair pay, workplace safety, social dialogue, turnover, wellbeing.
Technology impact: automation, surveillance, digital dependency, ethical AI practices.
Partner fairness: supplier treatment, payment terms, negotiating power, subcontracting practices.
Personal data: collection, storage, customer data use, GDPR compliance, security breaches.
Product/service quality: reliability, user safety, customer satisfaction, recall management.
Price competitiveness: affordability for consumers, pricing practices, cost transparency.
Score computed from the 10 dimensions above (weighted average). Source: CSR reports, court decisions, business press and salary surveys.
Financial data
Source: Yahoo Finance
Updated 18/03/2026, 00:03
- Favourites & Custom lists
- PDF / CSV Export
- Portfolio analysis
- Risk level alerts
- API Access